INDUSTRY INSIGHTThought Leadership

The GCC agri-nutrient industry in 2025: Trends, risks, and the road ahead

By Dr. Sana Ben Kebaier, Head of Economic Research Department, GPCA

Executive summary

The GCC’s agri-nutrient producers enter late-2025 with steady operations, dependable export flows, and a clearer path for low-carbon ammonia. The operating context is shaped by: (1) normalizing global agri-nutrient use above pre-pandemic highs, (2) policy shifts such as the EU’s CBAM, (3) trade-route fragility in and around the Red Sea/Suez, and (4) China’s evolving export controls. The strategic response in the GCC is straightforward: keep the molecules flowing reliably to core growth markets, harden logistics, prepare product-level emissions data, and progress low-carbon ammonia.

Source: GPCA analysis, IFASTAT (2025)

Demand corridors that anchor GCC flows

Global fertilizer use reached a record of approximately 206 million tons of nutrients in 2024[1], driven by nitrogen and potash. This demand is concentrated in a few significant “corridors” that map closely to the GCC export portfolio; urea and ammonia on the nitrogen side, and phosphate products (DAP/MAP) from Saudi Arabia, creating durable routes for volume placement and pricing discovery.

South Asia is the single largest pull on global agri-nutrients and the cornerstone corridor for GCC nitrogen. For GCC producers, this corridor offers: (1) scale and year-round offtake for prilled/granular urea; (2) policy-linked, tender-driven demand that provides clear shipment calendars; and (3) growing interest in direct ammonia/urea solutions for blending and industrial use. On phosphates, Saudi DAP/MAP is competitive into India’s subsidy framework, reinforcing two-way GCC exposure.

While China is a emerging as a major producer, the broader East and Southeast Asian belt is an enduring import basin for urea and phosphates. Plantation crops (oil palm, rubber), rice, and horticulture sustain relatively high nutrient intensity, keeping urea and DAP/MAP consumption resilient. For the GCC, this corridor balances South Asia’s tender cycles with more diversified, distributor-led channels, supporting shipment smoothing, product mix optimization (urea, DAP/MAP, some ammonium sulphate), and growing opportunities for specialty nitrogen grades as mechanization and precision application advance.

In Latin America, Brazil anchors this corridor and is the world’s largest importer of potash and a top buyer of urea and phosphates, driven by export-oriented soy, corn, sugarcane, and coffee. Although GCC has limited upstream potash exposure, the corridor is highly relevant for urea and for Saudi DAP/MAP, where competitive freight and large parcel sizes make Brazil an attractive sink. Seasonality provides clear shipping peaks, and rising double-cropping sustains the structural import requirement. The corridor also diversifies GCC demand away from Asia’s policy swings.

A mature and relatively self-sufficient market in nitrogen and potash, North America still imports select phosphate products and can absorb opportunistic urea cargoes when regional balances tighten. For GCC suppliers, this corridor is tactical rather than foundational, offering arbitrage opportunities around outages, weather shocks, or logistics constraints, but it is valuable for portfolio flexibility.

Beyond the anchor corridors, four secondary basins matter: Africa offers the strongest medium-term upside for GCC urea/DAP as mechanization and food-security programs expand (North/West sizable already; East/South growing from a low base); West Asia/Turkey provides near-market, short-haul lifts and quick turns; Oceania is a steady, spec-sensitive urea/DAP buyer with predictable seasons; and Europe & Central Asia are mixed/local production in parts, import needs in others, so GCC flows are mostly opportunistic.

What this means for GCC flows

  • Anchor on Asia + Brazil: South Asia and East/Southeast Asia together absorb the largest pool of urea and DAP, Brazil provides scale and crop-driven seasonality for urea/DAP and deepens diversification.
  • Match product to corridor:
    • Urea: Core into South Asia and Southeast Asia; competitive into Brazil.
    • Phosphates (DAP/MAP): Strong fit into India and Brazil; selective in Southeast Asia and Africa as distributor networks expand.
    • Ammonia: Remains a niche export relative to urea but can ride industrial demand in Asia and occasional arbitrage into the Americas.

In short, South Asia, East/Southeast Asia, and Latin America are the three primary “anchor corridors” for GCC agri-nutrient exports, with Africa and West Asia as the next wave of growth basins. Aligning the product mix (urea and DAP/MAP foremost), freight strategy, and channel partnerships around these lanes will sustain high utilization and commercial resilience as global nutrient use continues to increase, driven by demand for N and K.

GCC pulse: Assets, projects and competitive positioning

The GCC is positioning itself as a top-tier agri-nutrient hub: Saudi Arabia now ranks among the world’s leaders (5th in nitrogen, 6th in phosphate, 7th overall), while the broader GCC commands approximately 7% of global nitrogen and phosphate output. The next leg of competitiveness comes from a visible pipeline of blue/green/low-carbon ammonia that aligns with importers’ decarbonization mandates and preserves market access as carbon policies tighten.

What anchors competitiveness?

  • Scale and reliability: Large, integrated facilities with advantaged feedstock and port infrastructure.
  • Product breadth: Urea and DAP/MAP at a global scale, with growing low-carbon ammonia.
  • Route optionality: Proximity to South/East Asia and short-haul West Asia/Turkey; Brazil for scale parcels.

GCC sustainable ammonia assets and pipeline:

Country Company Project Status Capacity CAPEX
Saudi Arabia SABIC & Saudi Aramco Jubail Blue Hydrogen–Ammonia Expected 2026 5.0 mtpa blue ammonia $10 bn
Saudi Arabia Ma’aden Ras Al-Khair Ammonia Plant Operational since 2022 3.3 mtpa ammonia ~$8.5 bn
Saudi Arabia NEOM, ACWA Power, Air Products NEOM Green Hydrogen Expected 2026 1.2 mtpa green ammonia $8.4 bn
Qatar QatarEnergy Blue Ammonia Project Expected 2026 1.2 mtpa blue ammonia $1.2 bn
UAE TA’ZIZ & Fertiglobe (ADNOC) Low-Carbon Ammonia Expected 2027 1.0 mtpa low-carbon ammonia $500 m
Oman OQ OQ Ammonia Plant Operational since 2023 0.365 mtpa ammonia $463 m

Source: GPCA research, 2025

Geopolitics and trade risk map for the next 12–18 months

Over the next 12–18 months, two policy blocks set the tone for GCC agri-nutrient trade. In the U.S., the April 2025 blanket 10% tariff on all imports and China’s 84–125% retaliation on U.S. goods raise the risk that American buyers (and displaced Chinese volumes) reshuffle flows; about 11.4% of GCC chemical exports (USD 2.84 billion) sit in the potential blast radius, meaning U.S. bound tons could be redirected into Asia and squeeze margins.

In Europe, CBAM is already in its transition phase (since Oct-2023) with fertilizers included from day one and moves to a definitive, paid phase in Jan-2026, covered products already span ammonia, nitric acid, urea, and potassium nitrates, exposing roughly 11% of GCC chemical exports to future carbon costs and audit requirements.

Outlook: Staying the course: Utilization up, risk managed

Demand in the anchor corridors (India, Southeast Asia, and Brazil) remains resilient, with record nutrient use that favors GCC urea and DAP/MAP. The introduction of low-carbon ammonia capacity in 2026–2027 presents a strategic option that maintains EU access under CBAM and unlocks premium offtake in Europe and North Asia.

Overall, volumes look secure; margins largely hinge on timing, routing, and demonstrable carbon performance. With a product mix that evolves from urea/DAP today toward low-CI ammonia as projects mature, and with ongoing progress in CCUS and hydrogen, the GCC sector is positioned to sustain high operating rates, defend market share, and access emerging premiums rather than merely absorbing policy costs.

 

References:

[1] IFA Medium-Term Outlook (2025)